From what I know, the question arose among the Corinthians about eating meat that had been offered to idols. It was a thriving business because after sacrifices had been made, the meat being cooked, would be eaten by those in the idol’s temple and sold in the market place. There was a lot of meat available to those who wanted it. It was an easy source of food.
“1 Now concerning things offered to idols: We know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love edifies.”
It amazes me that anything, including “knowledge” can lead us into pride. Wisdom, skill, appearance, ability, talents, and anything else can lead us along the path to where we become haughty and think too highly of ourselves. The truth is we are nothing but dirt. If we have anything, it is from the hand of God and belongs to Him. Paul shows the contrast between the end result of those who have knowledge and love. Knowledge brings pride, but love instructs, improves, and builds up.
“2 And if anyone thinks that he knows anything, he knows nothing yet as he ought to know. “
This is the simple truth of the matter. If we think we know, we really know nothing as we should know it. I think about all the evolutionists out there who think they “know” how things came to be as they are today. We know they are in error. Their knowledge puffs them up and they look down on those of us who believe in Intelligent Design. I think this is similiar to what Paul is referring to. Those with “knowledge” about things offered to idols (I believe these were some in the church) who were eating the meat in their Christian liberty were causing problems for their brethren. They may have even been proudly looking down on those who didn’t eat because of their “knowledge.” And they didn’t bother to build up their brothers as love would have done. Paul points out how they should edify the brethren as he proceeds.
“3 But if anyone loves God, this one is known by Him.”
This scripture makes me wonder if the Corinthians were accusing each other of not being real Christians because of this issue. There are some denominations in error today who believe their group are the only ones who will be going to heaven. The rest of us Christians are going to go to hell since we don’t belong to their particular church and believe their particular doctrine. Paul simply points out logically that if someone really loves God, then they are known by Him. I think “known” here is referring to a deep, intimate relationship. God completely knows us, better than anyone on this planet or even ourselves. God knows the hidden things of the mind and heart. No one else knows us like God. And we can’t forget that we love Him only because He first loved us and changed our hearts.
“4 Therefore concerning the eating of things offered to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is no other God but one. “
I like how Paul puts this. The simple, logical truth about idols is that they are nothing. They are not a god. An idol is a lifeless rock, a lifless piece of wood, or a lifeless piece of metal. Its dumbfounding how anyone could ever bow down and worship a lifeless, piece of man made sculpture as being a god. Though, you can go over to India today and observe the Hindu worship, which has idols. Even in some Catholic Churches, statues of Mary and Christ are revered. It is very disturbing, especially down in Latin America.
http://www.liveleak.com/e/d2e_1213570058
See Isaiah 41:7; 46:6-7
“5 For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as there are many gods and many lords), 6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live.”
Paul is simply saying that even if there are “gods” somewhere in heaven or here (which there isn’t) that for us Christians we are known by the true and only living God in the entire universe. God created us for Himself, and we have life through Christ. God is one and Paul reveals to us a little of the roles the Father and Christ fulfilled in creation. The Father, being the leader within the Godhead directed all things to be created as they are, and the universe was created through Christ (1 Corinthians 11:3; Colossians 1:16). The Father is the architect and Jesus is the builder. Not an easy concept to relay.
“7 However, there is not in everyone that knowledge; for some, with consciousness of the idol, until now eat it as a thing offered to an idol; and their conscience, being weak, is defiled. “
There are some in the church at this time that did not have the understanding that Paul is sharing here. When they ate meat offered to an idol, they saw it as meat offered to a real “god.” Some Christians may have really thought Zeus, Diana, or other “gods” really existed. We know they didn’t, but back then when idol worship and false religions dominated the Gentile world, it would be hard for them. Its just like today with false religion in our time. The followers of that religion really believe their “god” is real. The Muslims believe Allah is real. We know, Allah, was the moon “god” of the Arabian pantheon. They believe he is real to the point that “Allah” is the Arabic word that means God with a big “G” in our day instead of a little “g.” Allah and the God of the Bible are not the same.
“8 But food does not commend us to God; for neither if we eat are we the better, nor if we do not eat are we the worse. “
There is only one thing that matters between us and God. That is the precious sacrifice of Jesus Christ on our behalf. In Him, our sinfulness was placed on Him at the cross. In Him, His righteousness is given to us and we are justified before God. We are commended before God because of Jesus, nothing else. Food has no relevance in light of the truth of our salvation. We are saved by grace alone, not by works. So what we eat does not matter either way.
“9 But beware lest somehow this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to those who are weak. “
We have Christian liberty. We have been freed from the law in Christ. It was simply a teacher that led us to Christ because on our own we were law breakers. The penalty for breaking the Law of God is death. We have passed from that which brought death to that which brings life. Christ is the fulfillment of the law, and we were set free in Him. Jesus perfectly kept the law and was pure and righteous. We have been given that righteousness in Him. The law is good because as Paul says it shows us the difference between right and wrong, but the law was not 100% exhaustive in regard to every matter we might face. For those things that the moral law clearly does not condemn as wrong, Christian liberty comes into play. Though we should be wary because our liberty can make our brethren stumble as Paul goes on to explain.
“10 For if anyone sees you who have knowledge eating in an idol’s temple, will not the conscience of him who is weak be emboldened to eat those things offered to idols? 11 And because of your knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? 12 But when you thus sin against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, you sin against Christ.”
Here is the crux of the matter. If a brother sees us doing something they consider sin even though it isn’t and they do it, they are sinning. Violating conscience is sin. Shall our brethren sin because of our “knowledge?” Anything that violates the law of love for us is sin. So if our actions and liberty lead our brethren to do something they consider sin, we sin against Christ for the sake of their wounded and weak conscience. They are held accountable to Christ for their conscience. This point Paul makes would deflate any of the Corinthians who were puffed up in pride in regard to their liberty.
“13 Therefore, if food makes my brother stumble, I will never again eat meat, lest I make my brother stumble.”
This is Paul’s simple conclusion. If eating food causes my brother to sin, I will never again eat meat. If we love each other like Christ loves us, how much more shall we abstain from those things that our brethren consider sin. That way they don’t go off and eat that meat they shouldn’t because they consider it wrong. There are plenty of examples of this in our day. We don’t have heathen temples where sacrifices are made and meat is sold, but there are other areas where this could apply to us.
Some Christians believe it is okay to drink a little wine here and there as long as they don’t get drunk. Some Christians believe any form of alcohol at any level is sin. If I am at a restaraunt and I have a drink, then my brother sees me who considers drinking sin and orders one for himself and drinks it, his conscience is violated and I sin against my brother and Christ. This could be applied to anything that isn’t clearly given to us in black and white in the scriptures. I’m not saying I drink. I’m just using it as an example to illustrate Paul’s example.
Love the brethren, and don’t lead others into sin.
Peace.
1 Corinthians 9:1-18
During Paul’s ministry there were some in the Church who did not believe he was a true apostle. I was surprised when I learned that fact. One example is the Jewish group of believers who were called the Ebionites. They believed that Gentiles had to become Jews to be Christians and taught circumcision. They held other views that were considered heretical. Of course, Paul writes against those who taught that. It is clear that Paul had critics who attacked him and his apostleship. It is possible the slander had reached Corinth at the time of this letter, so Paul addresses it.
“1 Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord? 2 If I am not an apostle to others, yet doubtless I am to you. For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.”
Paul had a very special encounter with Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus. The Lord chose Paul, an enemy of the Church, to be a witness to the Gentiles, and he would suffer greatly for the name of Christ. Jesus specificaly chose him for a specific task and was sent. That makes him an apostle. The work Paul had done among the Gentiles, and the fact that his work was used by the Lord to produce fruit among them and bring unbelievers into the kingdom shows the truth of Paul’s calling. The Corinthians were part of that proof. Others may not have considered him an apostle, but he was to all those churches where he had laid the foundation of Christ.
“3 My defense to those who examine me is this: 4 Do we have no right to eat and drink? 5 Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas?”
I think Paul may be addressing particular attacks that are being made against him here. Of course him and Barnabas have the right to eat and drink. Maybe someone was calling them gluttons and drunks. Maybe they were criticising Paul’s team because they took believing wives with them. Some have used this text to say that Paul was married, but I don’t think so according to the information Paul gives back in early chapters about himself and marriage. I think Barnabas or other team members had wives. I think it is very interesting that some of the other apostles, brothers of the Lord, and even Peter had wives that they took with them. These texts are proof that the tradition of the Catholic Church of forcing Priests to remain single is wrong.
“6 Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working? 7 Who ever goes to war at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat of its fruit? Or who tends a flock and does not drink of the milk of the flock… 11 If we have sown spiritual things for you, is it a great thing if we reap your material things? 12 If others are partakers of this right over you, are we not even more?
Nevertheless we have not used this right, but endure all things lest we hinder the gospel of Christ.”
The slander must have included accepting money from churches for the work of Christ. Paul begins defending the practice of churches supporting full time servants of the Lord at this point. He draws on illustrations from the Old Testament to do so. He shows it is right to accept funds from the Church for their work, but then goes on to say to the Corinthians that he did not use this right in regard to them. That way there would be nothing to hinder the good news that he had brought to them.
“13 Do you not know that those who minister the holy things eat of the things of the temple, and those who serve at the altar partake of the offerings of the altar? 14 Even so the Lord has commanded that those who preach the gospel should live from the gospel.”
So in conclusion to that point Paul uses one further illustration from the Old Testament and the current practice of his time. The priests who served in the Temple were given the sacrifices as food for their table as commanded by God. And the Lord had revealed to the Church and commanded that those who work full time for Him should live from that work. The logical conclusion is that the Churches are to support those God has called to minister to them.
“15 But I have used none of these things, nor have I written these things that it should be done so to me; for it would be better for me to die than that anyone should make my boasting void.”
In regard to the Corinthians, Paul did not accept anything from them. Nor is he writing those things for it to begin to be done. I believe it is because of the slander that had been brought against him, Barnabas, and his team that he defends himself. And since he had been chosen to not accept anything, and had spoken about it, if he changed his mind it would be better to die. Then his enemies could in some way think they were justified in slandering him as they were doing.
“16 For if I preach the gospel, I have nothing to boast of, for necessity is laid upon me; yes, woe is me if I do not preach the gospel! 17 For if I do this willingly, I have a reward; but if against my will, I have been entrusted with a stewardship. 18 What is my reward then? That when I preach the gospel, I may present the gospel of Christ without charge, that I may not abuse my authority in the gospel.”
If Paul preached the Gospel and accepted funds from the Corinthians then he would no longer be able to say that he did it for the sake of Christ alone. His enemies could say he preached the Gospel out of a desire for money. Peter points out that some were doing that at that time(2 Peter 2:3). That was not Paul’s heart, therefore he did not accept financial contributions from the Corinthians.
Paul’s thought in regard to not preaching the gospel is one that brings God’s wrath to mind when he uses the word, “woe.” How terrible it would be for Paul if he didn’t do what the Lord had called and directed him to do. I think Paul willingly and unwillingly did what he had to do. There are two sides of the coin here. Of course Paul willingly wanted to serve the Lord, but I am sure there were some things that he suffered through that at times he was unwilling. I don’t think anyone wants to suffer the terrible things Paul went through such as stonings, scouraging, being in danger, cold, shipwrecked or anything else along those lines. Paul’s reward from the Lord was that he was able to preach the Gospel freely without accepting funds, that way Paul would not be tempted in anyway to abuse his position. Paul worked with his own hands to provide for himself and his companions. He was skilled in other areas that allowed him to survive. And Christ had helped him to be content in any circumstances (1 Timothy 6:8).
Peter writes that those who are to shepherd God’s flock are to not be greedy for money (1 Peter 5:2). God wants them to be willing and eager to serve. He wants them to be content and rely on Him. I think about today how the unbelieving world sees this issue. I turn on Christian television and see how they are focused on nothing but money. The end result is that those who desire money and wealth in the leadership of churches bring criticism and negativity to the name they represent.
I really do not think that pleases Christ. Men of God should be content with what God provides for them. They should flee from greed and live modest, Christ honoring life styles. After all Jesus is the example to follow. Especially in our day with all the scandals, greedy, false teachers out there like Robert Tilton. I was really unhappy when I saw that he was back on television, as I was when I turn through channels and come across Jimmy Swaggart. They drag the name of Jesus through the mud with their antics, then after taking off some time they come back to do it again. It is terrible what some gullible, ignorant Christians will listen to and some of the men they follow. Like sheep without a shepherd. It grieves my heart.
Its nothing new. The priesthood in OT times grew corrupt and wicked as well. Jesus looked on the people when He came as sheep without a shepherd, and God through the prophets severly condemned the corruption and religious hypocritical leaders. Jesus did the same at the Temple.
Paul writes to Timothy, “For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs. But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness” (1 Timothy 6:10-11).